Iraq war probe portrays Britain as frustrated sidekick to US: NYT
London, Dec. 14 (ANI): Britain’s ongoing Iraq war inquiry has opened up a can of worms, but one common picture, which has emerged after confessions of most generals, diplomats and intelligence officials, portrays Britain as “a frustrated sidekick to the American juggernaut, according to the New York Times.
So for, the inquiry panel has found that former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who was keen to build a close personal relationship with then-President George W. Bush, overrode his advisers’ cautions and hastened Britain into a war that it could, and perhaps should, have avoided.
The report goes on saying that witnesses of the inquiry panel have presented Britain as a disregarded voice of diplomatic and military prudence, unable to restrain zealous American officials caught up in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks.
The embarrassing revelations are unlikely to fetch Prime Minister Brown the much-needed public support for the Afghanistan war that he had hoped to achieve from the public inquiry into the Iraq war.
Meanwhile, in a BBC radio interview over the weekend, Blair, unrepentant, said that he would have gone to war against Saddam Hussein even if he had known beforehand that Iraq had no unconventional weapons.
The intelligence indicating the existence of such weapons, cited at the time as the primary reason that Britain committed more than 45,000 troops to the invasion. (ANI)
Related posts:
- Britain went to war with Iraq on “assumption” of WMDs: Jonathan Powell
- MI6 chiefs to be quizzed in Iraq war probe
- Iraq invasion was right even if Saddam Hussein didn’t possess WMD: Blair
- Britain initially distanced itself from ‘unlawful’ Iraq invasion
- Blair was warned by 27 lawyers ‘Iraq invasion without UN backing was illegal’
- UK inquiry committee to hear Blair give Iraq War evidence, but in secret
- Blair knew 10 days in advance before Iraq war that Saddam did not have WMD
- Blair asked defence chiefs to prepare war strategy a year before Iraq invasion
- Blair neglected intelligence report warning that Saddam didn’t possess WMD
- Iraq inquiry: Bush was determined to overthrow Saddam
- ‘Defiant’ Blair insists Saddam Hussein posed WMD threat to world at Iraq war inquiry
- Former British commanders accuse Brown of misleading Iraq war inquiry
- Blair to give evidence in public on Iraq war
- Brit, US officials were looking for “smoking gun” to justify Iraq invasion
- Bush, Blair signed ‘blood deal’ to overthrow Saddam before Iraq war
